🔗 Share this article

Authorities have called it as one of the largest scams of its kind in the United Kingdom.

Altogether 14 people have been convicted for their role in a multi-million pound scheme to swindle over 3,500 holiday ownership investors.

The victims were keen to terminate decades-old timeshare contracts and went looking for assistance.

Most were aged between 60 and 80. More than 500 of them surrendered over £10,000, and a single victim transferred more than £80,000.

Those affected were faced intense sales meetings extending for six hours. They were left out of pocket, owning valueless fake "rewards" and remained trapped in high-priced holiday ownership agreements they frequently were unable to use.

The Business Central to the Deception

The firm at the centre of the scheme was Sell My Timeshare (SMT). They collected customers' funds to fund the owners' luxurious way of life of exclusive education, high-end properties and personal aircraft.

The man at the helm of the organization, the main defendant, was sentenced to a seven-and-half year jail time in January for conspiracy to defraud.

Recently, his wife one of the co-defendants was part of the concluding cases to hear their sentences.

She was handed a two-year long deferred imprisonment at the judicial venue after pleading guilty to financial crime.

It has been a extended wait and marks a major victory for the victims who came forward, the law enforcement and legal representatives.

The Way the Inquiry Started

I first heard about SMT was in the mid-2016. The position was in the research department of a broadcasting service, creating current affairs programmes.

A acquaintance pointed out that his mum had assumed the ownership of a holiday property in the Spanish coast and, after decades of vacations, had started seeking to get out of the agreement.

It is important to recall how widespread timeshares had evolved with UK travelers in the last decades of the 20th century.

Vacation properties allowed families to use the equivalent unit every year, or trade their time slots with other owners who had units in alternative destinations. Approximately 600,000 sun-lovers accepted that chance.

The initial boom was linked to a numerous stories about unscrupulous sellers mis-selling properties. They appeared frequently on public interest broadcasts.

The typical vacation property deal bound owners for decades.

By 2016, those owners who had used their guaranteed place in the sun for 20 or 30 years were ageing, and a large proportion were hoping to end their association to their timeshares.

A number had health issues and couldn't get to their properties. Others just believed they'd got all they wanted from them. And some had died, in frequent situations bequeathing their loved ones to inherit the deals - including their regular contributions and service charges.

The Undercover Operation Progresses

This was the situation the family member had been placed. She searched the web for solutions and discovered the organization, a business whose digital platform promised to get her out of her deal.

However, having submitted funds and booked a meeting with them, her loved ones had doubts.

Additional investigation uncovered many victims reporting they had submitted funds and achieved no result from the service. Indeed, they had suffered financially. Substantial amounts.

The investigative unit started looking into what was going on. It quickly became clear that there were some shady characters active in the holiday ownership market.

A legal professional had numerous client reports waiting to sue SMT.

We spoke to clients who had dealt with the organization and they each reported similar experiences. They thought the business would acquire their investment away from them but when they went to a consultation (for which they paid up front) they were told there was no potential buyers.

Rather, they were encouraged - indeed pressured - to invest additional funds purchasing "the company's points system", named after the organization's holding firm, the overarching entity.

The precise definition was rather ambiguous. They appeared to be a form of credit, offering discount travel and amenities and shopping deals.

And they were apparently "exchangeable with additional holders, some time down the line.

Committing funds at the time would lead to an future return that would offset the firm's costs and result in the investor ahead financially, liberated eventually from their troublesome contract.

An unbelievable offer? Well, yes.

A 'Deceptive Tactic'

Assuming these reports were accurate, this was a major deception.

The technique is termed a "bait-and-switch."

An operator - specifically the organization - "baits" the consumer by advertising a specific service but then to state it cannot be provided, directing the client in the direction of another, inferior offering.

Such practices are unlawful. Armed with all the accounts we had assembled, we presented the rationale to covertly record one of the firm's consultations.

Such an operation demands time, effort, and strong justifications for why this is the exclusive approach to gather the information required to prove wrongdoing.

With approval secured, our compact group arranged a meeting with one of the firm's agents in the location.

Pretending to be a member of the public hoping to get his mum out of her timeshare contract|holiday ownership agreement