🔗 Share this article

Itbecame clear the manager could survive losing against lower-league opposition. He weathered losing a crucial European final against a particularly poor Spurs sides in living memory. He could survive losing at home to West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, an unwavering system, undermining the team's most promising academy products, a poor winning percentage, labeling his team the poorest in Manchester United history. But there was a single opponent against whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to tango. If you challenge the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous Premiership defender during Blackburn Rovers' championship campaign, the coach came at Jason Wilcox and appears to have failed. Even the most casual observer can see the irony here: a coach who frequently berated his squad for losing one-on-one duels succumbing in the face of the intense pressure and animal charisma of a England's top division's most feared football executives.

And frankly, this whole painful saga appears to portray the director in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been easy, based on his nine months in a similar role with the Saints, to view Jason Wilcox as merely a drudge in the United exoskeleton: a man whose appointment was due as much to his friendship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada as any verifiable talent. How wrong everyone was. By masterfully outsmarting United’s feted head coach, just as he bested the unfortunate a previous executive before him, he has demonstrated to be among the sport’s true generals: a tactical intellect of which United’s competitors will now be justifiably concerned.

A Tactical Clash Regarding System & Ideology

For example, this was the director who having been part of the leadership that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim in the first place, was instrumental in trying to persuade him to ditch his beloved formation. Naturally, these pleas met a certain resistance. But perhaps such directives carry more weight when issued by a man with the unimpeachable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of three England caps and a contributor to a championship team from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time he might agree to explain his thought processes publicly. Maybe one day he might be asked why Amorim is departing with full compensation, without any compensation reduction clause activated. But Jason Wilcox seldom speaks in public, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers in football – individuals such as him – simply operate at a level beyond our own mundane comprehension. Were he to speak, probably we would perceive would be ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Wanting is not the same as being ready to receive.

The Ultimate Authority In the Throne

But of course, in training our focus on the sporting director we overlook the real power behind the modern United throne. The director is, in reality, merely executing the directives of his line manager the billionaire owner, who in private has emphasized his desire for a four-man defense. According to reports, Ratcliffe has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for United to embrace analytics and metrics. Per reports, in an executive meeting soon after his minority ownership, he declared that the team's approach of play “shall be determined by this group”.

After all, Sir Jim is a specialist in these intricate footballing stuff, leveraging his previous experience in industry and yachting. Above all he remains incredibly rich, and it is known, the rich are superior: more perceptive, sagacious, more tactically astute, simply better. Who else could one trust to oversee a strategic plan of austerity, the construction of a new stadium that looks a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

The New Football Hierarchy: Executives Above Managers

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent in top-tier football. Historically, clubs foolishly delegated major sporting choices to subordinate staff such as coaches, scouts – players themselves. Maybe previously possible for a young, innovative manager with ideas and drive to go into a club and implement their plan supported to fruition. But how many companies have these guys established? What number of mass redundancies have they managed? Better by far to invest genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to decide the strategy by the directors and appoint someone who can tailor their offering to suit. If managers were once chefs, they are now more like Deliveroo drivers: not really responsible for the food, but still ultimately answerable should it be delivered poorly or leaks out to meet standards.

In the meantime, a coach's role is increasingly less about defining the vision and more about selling it: the front-facing representative of the operation, the public face for a club they have minimal power to influence. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of literal children into Europe and secures domestic cups, and essentially gets sacked for speaking out. A manager at Celtic sees his reputation ruined whereas the people who hired him live to blunder indefinitely.

A Neoliberal Game: Accountability for the Few

And possibly on some microcosmic level this is simply neoliberalism in action: the rise of a privileged overclass who can never be wrong, whose decisions are always sacrosanct, whose mistakes can invariably be sacked away without explanation. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach and then dismiss him for playing too much 3-4-3. Bring in the process guy and later discard him for taking excessive time. And most importantly be grateful; for your modest increases in ticket costs, for your new summer signings, for the fact that the adults – however well qualified – remain in control.